Un taux de diagnostics corrects de 80 % est trs dcevant. probably resulting in an incorrect diagnosis. Keywords: Celiac disease, Endomysial antibodies, Gluten-free diet, Tissue transglutaminase antibodies, Villous atrophy Rsum Au cours des quelques dernires annes, la Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, de Pavie, en Italie, un centre de rfrence tertiaire, le nombre de diagnostics de maladie c?liaque non confirms, tait particulirement lev. Il a donc t dcid dexplorer pourquoi ces diagnostics taient errons et par qui ils avaient t poss. Lhistoire clinique de tous les patients c?liaques adresss au centre a donc t rvalue. Entre dcembre 1998 et janvier 2007, 614 patients ayant re?u un diagnostic dans dautres tablissements et prsums atteints de maladie c?liaque se sont prsents la clinique AZD2906 ambulatoire du centre de rfrence tertiaire. Les rsultats histologiques et srologiques ont permis de confirmer le diagnostic chez 434 patients. Chez les 180 autres patients, le diagnostic initial de maladie c?liaque na pas pu tre confirm. Par consquent, les patients ont subi de nouveaux examens. Aprs rvaluation, le diagnostic de maladie c?liaque a t confirm chez 61 patients seulement parmi ces 180 cas. Les raisons du diagnostic initial erron ont t analyses. Un taux de diagnostics corrects de 80 % est trs dcevant. Il semble vident que la maladie c?liaque doit faire lobjet dinvestigations au moyen de biopsies duodnales et de dosages des anticorps c?liaques, mais cette stratgie pourtant bien connue nest pas toujours suivie et explique probablement les erreurs de diagnostic. Due to its high prevalence (1), interest in celiac disease (CD) has increased in the past few years, not only among gastroenterologists but also among patients and general practitioners (2). Our celiac outpatient clinic at the Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy, is a tertiary referral centre that sees patients who were diagnosed with CD at other hospitals, not only to provide them with gluten-free food certificates and regional health service tax exemptions, but also because of the persistence of their symptoms. One important aspect of our clinical work is represented by celiac patients in whom, due to a lack of clinical response to a gluten-free diet, refractory CD is suspected. Because it was shown that failure to respond to a gluten-free diet should always raise doubts regarding the initial diagnosis (3), it is mandatory in our clinic to verify whether all of these patients are actually affected by CD. In the past few years, we were under the impression that the number of diagnoses of CD not confirmed by our centre was particularly high and due to diagnoses of CD based on Marsh 1- and Marsh 2-type lesions (4), also known as minimal intestinal lesions, or in spite of negative celiac antibody results. To clarify our clinical point of view, we believe that a diagnosis of CD in patients with minimal intestinal lesions or who are negative for celiac antibodies, requires a great degree of skill and expertise in the celiac field (4C6). Although these two conditions certainly exist, presently, there is no consensus on how to diagnose CD in patients who present with minimal intestinal lesions only. Moreover, in our clinical experience, such lesions are rare and we believe that their epidemiological relevance has been Mouse monoclonal to MSX1 greatly overestimated in the past few years. We have recently shown (7) that minimal intestinal lesions are uncommon and are not inevitably due to CD. In the past 10 years, we AZD2906 have found only three patients who were affected by untreated CD and negative for celiac antibodies. Therefore, we decided to re-evaluate the clinical histories of all patients referred to our centre. An incorrect diagnosis of CD represents both a risk for the health of the patient C mainly because of the necessity of a lifelong gluten-free diet C and a considerable waste of money, time and resources for institutions. METHODS To confirm the diagnoses of CD made in other hospitals, criteria were very AZD2906 strict. Only diagnoses based on a well-oriented duodenal biopsy showing.