Our meta-analysis showed similar findings

Our meta-analysis showed similar findings. less than 12 months DAPT, 12 months DAPT did not reduce risk of myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, strokes, cardiac or all-cause mortality, but increased the risk of major bleeds (OR 1.60 95%CI: 1.22C2.11). DAPT beyond 12 months reduce risk of myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis, but there is substantial increase in major bleeding risk and all-cause mortality which need to be addressed. DAPT beyond 12 months does not appear to alter the risk of stroke. Coronary artery disease is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in developed and developing countries. Atheroma in coronary arteries reduces myocardial blood flow, leading to ischaemia and angina. Percutaneous coronary intervention is now widely performed in conjunction with medical therapy to relieve angina and improve exercise tolerance. After balloon angioplasty, implantation of a metallic stent helps to prevent recoil and restenosis. The stents used nowadays are usually coated with a polymer that elutes a drug such as sirolimus, paclitaxel, everolimus or zotarolimus to suppress neointimal hyperplasia. These drug-eluting stents (DES) delay endothelial healing and may increase the risk of stent thrombosis, but this can be reduced by dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Conventionally, patients receive DAPT for 6C12 months after DES implantation1,2. The efficacy and safety of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has been questioned. In clinical trials comparing different durations of DAPT, divergent results have been observed3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. In general, DAPT regimes shorter than 12 months have not been found to be detrimental, and have the advantage of fewer episodes of major bleeding13,14. However, a low percentage of late stent thrombosis remains a challenge. Recently, several clinical trials that examined whether longer periods of DAPT are beneficial have been completed7,9,10,11. There is therefore a need to re-examine, in the light of these new trials, the question of whether DAPT for longer than 12 months in patients who have received DES is efficacious and safe compared to DAPT for ICI 118,551 hydrochloride 12 months and less than 12 months. We used the powerful technique of meta-analysis to determine any reduction in cardiovascular events and any increase in serious adverse events such as bleeding or death. Methods We searched for randomised trials comparing different durations of DAPT (aspirin?+?P2Y12 inhibitor) after DES implantation on 18 November 2014. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane database of systematic reviews, recent meta-analyses on the subject, recent cardiology conference abstracts and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched using the search term Dual Antiplatelet therapy, Myocardial infarction, Stent thrombosis, Stroke, Drug Eluting Stent and Bleeding. For inclusion, the report had to contain the frequency of cardiovascular and bleeding events. A summary of the search process for the trials is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. The inclusion criteria were (1) articles or abstracts written in English; (2) participants had to be aged 18 or older; (3) patients had to be randomized to receive different durations of DAPT. Analyses of non-randomized trial subgroups were excluded. Data extraction and assessment of bias were performed ICI 118,551 hydrochloride by two investigators. The trials selected for inclusion were stratified into three groups according to the durations of DAPT: (1) 12 months DAPT vs. 12 months DAPT; (2) Rabbit Polyclonal to c-Jun (phospho-Tyr170) 12 months DAPT vs. 12 months DAPT; and (3) 12 months DAPT vs. 12 months DAPT. Efficacy outcomes were the frequency of myocardial infraction, stroke and stent thrombosis. The safety outcomes were the rate of cardiac and all-cause mortality, and the frequency of bleeding. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan (version 5.3.4). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of each trial and combination of trials were calculated using the random effects model. I2 statistics were calculated to evaluate heterogeneity among studies. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken to evaluate the effect of the inclusion or exclusion of a trial on the summary odds ratio. Bias in the selection or publication of studies was assessed using funnel plots, Beggs, Eggers and trim-and-fill tests. A P-value of 0.05 was taken to indicate statistical significance. We.Atheroma in coronary arteries reduces myocardial blood flow, leading to ischaemia and angina. weeks DAPT, 12 months DAPT did not reduce risk of myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, strokes, cardiac or all-cause mortality, but improved the risk of major bleeds (OR 1.60 95%CI: 1.22C2.11). DAPT beyond 12 months reduce risk of myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis, but there is substantial increase in major bleeding risk and all-cause mortality which need to be resolved. DAPT beyond 12 months does not appear to alter the risk of stroke. Coronary artery disease is ICI 118,551 hydrochloride one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in developed and developing countries. Atheroma in coronary arteries reduces myocardial blood flow, leading to ischaemia and angina. Percutaneous coronary treatment is now widely performed in conjunction with medical therapy to relieve angina and improve exercise tolerance. After balloon angioplasty, implantation of a metallic stent helps to prevent recoil and restenosis. The stents used nowadays are usually coated having a polymer that elutes a drug such as sirolimus, paclitaxel, everolimus or zotarolimus to suppress neointimal hyperplasia. These drug-eluting stents (DES) delay endothelial healing and may increase the risk of stent thrombosis, but this can be reduced by dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Conventionally, individuals receive DAPT for 6C12 weeks after DES implantation1,2. The effectiveness and security of long term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has been questioned. In medical tests comparing different durations of DAPT, divergent results have been observed3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. In general, DAPT regimes shorter than 12 months have not been found to be detrimental, and have the advantage of fewer episodes of major bleeding13,14. However, a low percentage of late stent thrombosis remains a challenge. Recently, several clinical tests that examined whether longer periods of DAPT are beneficial have been completed7,9,10,11. There is consequently a need to re-examine, in the light of these new tests, the query of whether DAPT for longer than 12 months in patients who have received DES is definitely efficacious and safe compared to DAPT for 12 months and less than 12 months. We used the powerful technique of meta-analysis to determine any reduction in cardiovascular events and any increase in severe adverse events such as bleeding or death. Methods We searched for randomised tests comparing different durations of DAPT (aspirin?+?P2Y12 inhibitor) after DES implantation about 18 November 2014. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane database of systematic evaluations, recent meta-analyses on the subject, recent cardiology conference abstracts and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched using the search term Dual Antiplatelet therapy, Myocardial infarction, Stent thrombosis, Stroke, Drug Eluting Stent and Bleeding. For inclusion, the report had to contain the rate of recurrence of cardiovascular and bleeding events. A summary of the search process for the tests is demonstrated in Supplementary Fig. 1. The inclusion criteria were (1) content articles or abstracts written in English; (2) participants had to be aged 18 or older; (3) patients had to be randomized to receive different durations ICI 118,551 hydrochloride of DAPT. Analyses of non-randomized trial subgroups were excluded. Data extraction and assessment of bias were performed by two investigators. The tests determined for inclusion were stratified into three organizations according to the durations of DAPT: (1) 12 months DAPT vs. 12 months DAPT; (2) 12 months DAPT vs. 12 months DAPT; and (3) 12 months DAPT vs. 12 months DAPT. Efficacy results were the rate of recurrence of myocardial infraction, stroke and stent thrombosis. The security outcomes were the pace of cardiac and all-cause mortality, and the rate of recurrence of bleeding. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan (version 5.3.4). Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of each trial and combination of tests were determined using the random effects model. I2 statistics were calculated to evaluate heterogeneity among studies. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken to evaluate the effect of the inclusion or exclusion of a trial within the summary odds ratio. Bias in the selection or publication.

Related Posts